Biden Administration Proposes New Pay Transparency/Equity Rule

April 2, 2024

On January 29, 2024, on the 15th anniversary of the enactment of the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the Biden Administration announced a proposed regulation to prohibit federal contractors and subcontractors from using job applicant’s prior salary history when setting pay and to require federal contractors to disclose the expected salary range in job postings. The proposal was published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2024 and comments were due on April 1, 2024.


Background

The proposed rule was issued by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council after being directed by President Biden in Executive Order 14069 issued in March of 2022 to promulgate proposed rules enhancing pay equity and transparency for federal contractors’ job applicants and employees. 


Proposed Rule

The proposal, which covers applicants and current employees seeking a position to perform work on or in connection with the contract, bans the use of salary history and also requires expansive compensation disclosure and notice requirements. The “in connection with” is defined as “work activities necessary to the performance of the contract but not specifically called for by the contract” (89 Fed. Reg. 5843, 5853). This vastly expanded definition will make it difficult for contractors to determine who is covered.)


Under the salary history portion of the proposal, federal contractors and subcontractors may not

  • Seek, directly or indirectly, the compensation history of any applicant from any person;
  • Retaliate against or refuse to consider any applicant for failing to respond to a compensation inquiry; or
  • Rely on an applicant’s compensation history for screening or considering an applicant for employment or in determining an applicant’s compensation, even if the applicant volunteers compensation history.


In addition, federal contractors will be required to include in all advertisements for job openings, placed by or on behalf of any position on or in connection with a contract, the following disclosure:

  • Salary, wages or pay range a contractor “in good faith” believes it will pay for the advertised position and may include:
  • Pay scale for the position,
  • Range of compensation for those currently working in similar jobs, or
  • Amount budgeted for the position.
  • General description of benefits and other forms of compensation applicable and, if half of the compensation is derived from commissions, bonuses, and/or overtime, the contractor must specify the percentage of overall compensation for each form of compensation that it in good faith believes will be paid.


Finally, federal contractors must provide a standard notice of these requirements as either part of the job announcement or application process, including the following, verbatim:


This employer is a Federal contractor or subcontractor. Under 48 C.F.R. (FAR) 52.222–ZZ, Prohibition on Compensation History Inquiries and Requirement for Compensation Disclosures by Contractors During Recruitment and Hiring, Federal contractors and subcontractors may not inquire about or rely on an applicant’s compensation history to screen an applicant for employment or to determine the applicant’s pay for a position on or in connection with a Federal contract or subcontract, even when the information is offered without prompting. The employer must also disclose the compensation for the position in all advertisements for the job opening.

 

Applicants alleging Federal contractor or subcontractor violations of these requirements: These applicants may submit a complaint to the central collection point of the agency that issued the solicitation for the Federal contract or awarded the Federal contract or order, as identified at www.dol.gov/general/labor-advisors.  The complaint must be submitted within 180 days of the date the violation occurred. The agency that issued the solicitation or awarded the contract or order on which this applicant would primarily work is _______. [Contractor to fill in with appropriate agency name] For applicants supporting multiple agencies, complaints should copy the central collection point of all known agencies to be supported by the applicant’s position.

 

Applicants alleging discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status should file a complaint with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). If complaints alleging discrimination are submitted to an agency central collection point rather than directly with OFCCP, the complaints will be forwarded to OFCCP. Information on the process for filing a formal complaint of discrimination with OFCCP can be found at the following website: https:// www.dol.gov/agencies/ofccp/contact/ file-complaint.

 

The notice would require contractors to identify which agency issued the solicitation, award, or the order on which the applicant would primarily work. Any applicant who alleges violation of these requirements may submit a complaint to “the central collection point of the agency” that issued the solicitation or awarded the contract. The central collection point of the contracting agency is identified as DOL Labor Advisors assigned to the contracting agency.

 

Substantial New Burdens Imposed

While initially the proposal looks similar to current state and local pay transparency requirements, it places a substantial additional burden on contractors because of its differences with current pay transparency requirements. The requirement to tie each position to a specific contract is especially onerous because contractors do not always know which position will be tied to which federal contract and many workers devote time to many contracts in the course of their job.

 

Next Steps

While the FAR Council is considering the comments to its proposal, several courts are reconsidering whether the President has the authority under the Procurement Act to issue Executive Orders like this one. Despite the likelihood of court challenges, federal contractors should carefully review this proposal and begin to determine how to comply with the new proposal.


FortneyScott will continue to monitor these developments and provide updates as appropriate. Clients with questions can reach out to their FortneyScott attorney.


Issued:  April 2, 2024

On January 20, 2026, David Fortney, Nita Beecher, and Burt Fishman on The DC Insider - Employer Update Podcast

February 27, 2026
State of Civil Rights Under Trump 2.0

Regulatory Update: DOL Proposes Rescission of Current Independent Contractor Rule; NLRB Replaces Joint Employment Rule

February 26, 2026
The regulatory landscape continues to shift – both the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have announced regulatory changes relating to independent contractors and joint employment. Overview DOL has proposed largely returning to the independent contractor rule issued in the first Trump Administration that includes a streamlined five factor economic‑reality test. The NLRB has proposed reinstating the 2020 joint employer regulation. Both of these proposed regulatory changes are positive developments for employers and, if finalized, will provide greater clarity and certainty for employer compliance. More Detailed Information DOL Rulemaking : The DOL issued a significant proposed rule to determine employee versus independent contractor status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). DOL’s proposed rule will reinstate, with modifications, the streamlined economic‑reality test adopted during the first Trump Administration in the January 7, 2021 final rule. Under the 2021 rule, the DOL applied a streamlined economic‑reality test that focused on whether a worker is economically dependent on the employer or is operating an independent business. The 2021 rule identifies five factors to apply with the first two factors carrying more weight : (1) the nature and degree of control over the work; (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss; (3) skill required for the work; (4) permanence of the working relationship; and (5) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. The DOL’s modifications to the 2021 standard seek to clarify whether a worker depends on the company to provide work, as opposed to depending on their own business to generate work opportunities. The analysis focuses on the source of work, not the percentage of income the worker earns from a particular company. The DOL also proposes to extend this updated analysis to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA), both of which rely on the FLSA’s definition of “employment.” Key Takeaways for DOL IC Rule: The DOL’s 2024 rule, which established a six-factor test that created significant uncertainties when applied, will be rescinded. The DOL proposes returning to the 2021 rule’s five-factor test, with certain updates. The same analysis would apply under the FMLA and MSPA, aligning worker classification standards across these laws to reduce compliance and enforcement risks. The proposed changes support employer interests and will enable employers to assess independent contractor relationships and mitigate compliance and enforcement risks. If finalized, this rule should have wide-reaching implications for employers, contractors, gig economy platforms, and industries that rely on flexible labor models. NLRB Withdraws and Replaces its Joint Employer Regulation: The National Labor Relations Board will issue a final rule withdrawing its 2023 Joint Employer Rule in the Federal Register on Friday, February 27, 2026. This is following a March 8, 2024 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB , 723 F.Supp. 3d 498, 519 (E.D. Tex. 2024) vacated the 2023 Rule before it took effect. As a result, the Board is reinstating the prior 2020 Joint Employer Status Under the National Labor Relations Act, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 103.40, as the governing standard for determining joint‑employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. We will continue to monitor these rulemakings closely. Please reach out to FortneyScott, if you would like to submit comments to the agencies or conduct a proactive assessment of the existing independent contractor or joint employerrelationships.

David Fortney at ABA 2026 Wage and Hour Committee Midwinter Meeting

February 25, 2026
A Perspective on Trends from the DOL and on a State Government Level

FortneyScott's Workplace Legal Compliance Webinar Series - Part II: What to Expect from DOL

February 16, 2026
Having been fully funded for FY2026 and with new leadership in place, employers can expect much more from the Department of Labor in the second year of Trump 2.0. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at noon EDT to learn DOL’s priorities for 2026 and how to ensure compliance. Key Topics to be Covered Include: Overview of DOL Trump 2.0 officials Budget for FY2026 Next Steps from Wage & Hour Status of regulations PAID Program Return of Opinion Letters Child Labor enforcement FY2025 recovery Project Firewall Joint project with DOJ, EEOC and USCIS over H-1Bs Future of OFCCP – What to expect from the agency now that it has been funded Key Takeaways to ensure compliance This webinar is the second in a three-part series designed for compliance professions, in-house counsel, HR and inclusion leaders, and other business leaders responsible for labor and employment law compliance. To register for FortneyScott’s Workplace Legal Compliance training series, please click here .

David Fortney at PLI on January 26, 2026

February 12, 2026
Fortney Scott Attorney David Fortney Co-Chairs and Speaks at the Practicing Law Institute's Annual Wage & Hour Litigation and Compliance for 2026

Trump Administration Signals Expanded Federal Scrutiny of Employer DEI

February 5, 2026
DEI continues to be a high priority issue for the Trump Administration. Recent actions by multiple federal agencies, signal increased scrutiny of employer DEI programs. In the past week alone, the Administration has taken several significant actions: The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike based on a May 2024 Commissioner’s charge filed by EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas. The subpoena seeks company-wide information dating back to 2018, reflecting a more expansive approach to DEI-related investigation and increased willingness to pursue enforcement in federal court. The Chair of the Federal Trade Commission issued letters to 42 leading law firms warning that participation in the Mansfield Certification program may raise antitrust concerns. EEOC Chair Lucas was copied on the correspondence, highlighting coordinated federal agency attention to diversity-based initiatives. President Trump made additional demands on Harvard concerning its DEI-practices, substantially increasing the monetary demands from $200 million to $1 billion, while signaling the possibility of additional legal action, including potential criminal exposure. Federal funding was suspended for one of the largest infrastructure projects in the U.S., the $16 Billion Hudson Tunnel project, based on minority set aside contracting requirements, prompting litigation. This action, which impacts train services between New York City and New Jersey, underscores the intersection of DEI initiatives and federal funding risks. What should employers do now? In the current enforcement environment, employers should: Continue to assess DEI programs for legal risk. With a full EEOC quorum now in place, increased scrutiny of corporate DEI programs is likely. Although most employers have reviewed their DEI programs and made necessary changes to address legal compliance, the renewed focus on DEI requires ongoing assessment and update of DEI programs. Ensuring that these best practices remain in place and are followed is crucial. Prepare for the possibility of broader EEOC investigations. Recent enforcement activity reflects an increased willingness by the EEOC to pursue company-wide inquiries, often supported by expedited subpoena enforcement in matters that originate as individual discrimination charges filed by white employees and applicants. Evaluate participation in diversity rankings and certifications. Employers should evaluate whether participation in voluntary diversity assessments, ranking programs or other public reporting of diversity results unnecessarily raises the organization's profile and invites heightened scrutiny from the EEOC and other enforcement agencies. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for additional information on how to be prepared and other best practices recommendations.
Show More

On January 20, 2026, David Fortney, Nita Beecher, and Burt Fishman on The DC Insider - Employer Update Podcast

February 27, 2026
State of Civil Rights Under Trump 2.0

Regulatory Update: DOL Proposes Rescission of Current Independent Contractor Rule; NLRB Replaces Joint Employment Rule

February 26, 2026
The regulatory landscape continues to shift – both the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have announced regulatory changes relating to independent contractors and joint employment. Overview DOL has proposed largely returning to the independent contractor rule issued in the first Trump Administration that includes a streamlined five factor economic‑reality test. The NLRB has proposed reinstating the 2020 joint employer regulation. Both of these proposed regulatory changes are positive developments for employers and, if finalized, will provide greater clarity and certainty for employer compliance. More Detailed Information DOL Rulemaking : The DOL issued a significant proposed rule to determine employee versus independent contractor status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). DOL’s proposed rule will reinstate, with modifications, the streamlined economic‑reality test adopted during the first Trump Administration in the January 7, 2021 final rule. Under the 2021 rule, the DOL applied a streamlined economic‑reality test that focused on whether a worker is economically dependent on the employer or is operating an independent business. The 2021 rule identifies five factors to apply with the first two factors carrying more weight : (1) the nature and degree of control over the work; (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss; (3) skill required for the work; (4) permanence of the working relationship; and (5) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. The DOL’s modifications to the 2021 standard seek to clarify whether a worker depends on the company to provide work, as opposed to depending on their own business to generate work opportunities. The analysis focuses on the source of work, not the percentage of income the worker earns from a particular company. The DOL also proposes to extend this updated analysis to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA), both of which rely on the FLSA’s definition of “employment.” Key Takeaways for DOL IC Rule: The DOL’s 2024 rule, which established a six-factor test that created significant uncertainties when applied, will be rescinded. The DOL proposes returning to the 2021 rule’s five-factor test, with certain updates. The same analysis would apply under the FMLA and MSPA, aligning worker classification standards across these laws to reduce compliance and enforcement risks. The proposed changes support employer interests and will enable employers to assess independent contractor relationships and mitigate compliance and enforcement risks. If finalized, this rule should have wide-reaching implications for employers, contractors, gig economy platforms, and industries that rely on flexible labor models. NLRB Withdraws and Replaces its Joint Employer Regulation: The National Labor Relations Board will issue a final rule withdrawing its 2023 Joint Employer Rule in the Federal Register on Friday, February 27, 2026. This is following a March 8, 2024 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB , 723 F.Supp. 3d 498, 519 (E.D. Tex. 2024) vacated the 2023 Rule before it took effect. As a result, the Board is reinstating the prior 2020 Joint Employer Status Under the National Labor Relations Act, codified at 29 C.F.R. § 103.40, as the governing standard for determining joint‑employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. We will continue to monitor these rulemakings closely. Please reach out to FortneyScott, if you would like to submit comments to the agencies or conduct a proactive assessment of the existing independent contractor or joint employerrelationships.

David Fortney at ABA 2026 Wage and Hour Committee Midwinter Meeting

February 25, 2026
A Perspective on Trends from the DOL and on a State Government Level

FortneyScott's Workplace Legal Compliance Webinar Series - Part II: What to Expect from DOL

February 16, 2026
Having been fully funded for FY2026 and with new leadership in place, employers can expect much more from the Department of Labor in the second year of Trump 2.0. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at noon EDT to learn DOL’s priorities for 2026 and how to ensure compliance. Key Topics to be Covered Include: Overview of DOL Trump 2.0 officials Budget for FY2026 Next Steps from Wage & Hour Status of regulations PAID Program Return of Opinion Letters Child Labor enforcement FY2025 recovery Project Firewall Joint project with DOJ, EEOC and USCIS over H-1Bs Future of OFCCP – What to expect from the agency now that it has been funded Key Takeaways to ensure compliance This webinar is the second in a three-part series designed for compliance professions, in-house counsel, HR and inclusion leaders, and other business leaders responsible for labor and employment law compliance. To register for FortneyScott’s Workplace Legal Compliance training series, please click here .

David Fortney at PLI on January 26, 2026

February 12, 2026
Fortney Scott Attorney David Fortney Co-Chairs and Speaks at the Practicing Law Institute's Annual Wage & Hour Litigation and Compliance for 2026

Trump Administration Signals Expanded Federal Scrutiny of Employer DEI

February 5, 2026
DEI continues to be a high priority issue for the Trump Administration. Recent actions by multiple federal agencies, signal increased scrutiny of employer DEI programs. In the past week alone, the Administration has taken several significant actions: The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike based on a May 2024 Commissioner’s charge filed by EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas. The subpoena seeks company-wide information dating back to 2018, reflecting a more expansive approach to DEI-related investigation and increased willingness to pursue enforcement in federal court. The Chair of the Federal Trade Commission issued letters to 42 leading law firms warning that participation in the Mansfield Certification program may raise antitrust concerns. EEOC Chair Lucas was copied on the correspondence, highlighting coordinated federal agency attention to diversity-based initiatives. President Trump made additional demands on Harvard concerning its DEI-practices, substantially increasing the monetary demands from $200 million to $1 billion, while signaling the possibility of additional legal action, including potential criminal exposure. Federal funding was suspended for one of the largest infrastructure projects in the U.S., the $16 Billion Hudson Tunnel project, based on minority set aside contracting requirements, prompting litigation. This action, which impacts train services between New York City and New Jersey, underscores the intersection of DEI initiatives and federal funding risks. What should employers do now? In the current enforcement environment, employers should: Continue to assess DEI programs for legal risk. With a full EEOC quorum now in place, increased scrutiny of corporate DEI programs is likely. Although most employers have reviewed their DEI programs and made necessary changes to address legal compliance, the renewed focus on DEI requires ongoing assessment and update of DEI programs. Ensuring that these best practices remain in place and are followed is crucial. Prepare for the possibility of broader EEOC investigations. Recent enforcement activity reflects an increased willingness by the EEOC to pursue company-wide inquiries, often supported by expedited subpoena enforcement in matters that originate as individual discrimination charges filed by white employees and applicants. Evaluate participation in diversity rankings and certifications. Employers should evaluate whether participation in voluntary diversity assessments, ranking programs or other public reporting of diversity results unnecessarily raises the organization's profile and invites heightened scrutiny from the EEOC and other enforcement agencies. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for additional information on how to be prepared and other best practices recommendations.

2026 Changes to DC Employment Law

February 4, 2026
As we move further into 2026, employers should review notable changes to DC employment laws that may impact workplace policies and compliance obligations. Minimum and Living Wage Rates : From January 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, any DC contract or government assistance recipient receiving $100,000 or more, as well as their subcontractors receiving at least $15,000 for contracts or $50,000 for government assistance, must pay at least the living wage rate of $17.95 per hour. Starting July 1, 2026, both the minimum wage rate and the living wage rate will increase to $18.40 per hour. For tipped employees, the base minimum wage increases to $10.30 per hour on July 1, 2026. Non-Compete Restrictions : Starting January 1, 2026, employers are banned from entering non-compete agreements with employees earning less than $162,164, and with medical specialists earning less than $270,274 Pay Stub Transparency : Starting January 1, 2026, employers must itemize all sources of compensation on employees’ pay stubs, including wages, bonuses, commissions, tips, service charges, etc.

Part I: What to Expect from EEOC

February 3, 2026
In the second year of Trump 2.0, employers must stay alert to EEOC’s shifting priorities. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, February 3, 2026 at noon EDT to learn what to expect from EEOC and the key steps employers must take now to ensure compliance with the new EEOC priorities. Key Topics to be Covered Include:  New Commission quorum , and how it will impact EEOC priorities; Current EEOC priorities , including eliminating unlawful DEI, protecting religious liberties, limiting sex discrimination to biological sex and focusing on anti-American discrimination; Notable EEOC enforcement actions , updates, and emerging trends in the Administration’s civil rights enforcement; and, Actionable strategies and key takeaways to ensure compliance with Title VII, the PWFA, etc. This webinar is the first in a three-part series designed for compliance professionals, in-house counsel, HR and inclusion leaders, and other business leaders responsible for labor and employment law compliance.

FortneyScott's Workplace Legal Compliance Webinar Series - Part I: What to Expect from EEOC

January 23, 2026
In the second year of Trump 2.0, employers must stay alert to EEOC’s shifting priorities. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, February 3, 2026 at noon EDT to learn what to expect from EEOC and the key steps employers must take now to ensure compliance with the new EEOC priorities. Key Topics to be Covered Include: New Commission quorum , and how it will impact EEOC priorities; Current EEOC priorities , including eliminating unlawful DEI, protecting religious liberties, limiting sex discrimination to biological sex and focusing on anti-American discrimination; Notable EEOC enforcement actions, updates, and emerging trends in the Administration’s civil rights enforcement; and, Actionable strategies and key takeaway s to ensure compliance with Title VII, the PWFA, etc. This webinar is the first in a three-part series designed for compliance professionals, in-house counsel, HR and inclusion leaders, and other business leaders responsible for labor and employment law compliance. To register for FortneyScott’s Workplace Legal Compliance training series, please click here .

FortneyScott Launches New Workplace Legal Compliance Training Series

January 21, 2026
As employers prepare to face the second year of Trump 2.0, FortneyScott is convening a three-month, complimentary training initiative to help clients stay ahead of the curve and confidently navigate the shifting terrain. From February through April of 2026, our Workplace Legal Compliance Series will deliver timely, practical insights through: Monthly Webinars featuring FortneyScott attorneys unpacking the latest developments. DC Insider—Employer Update Podcasts offering candid analysis from Washington insiders. Real-Time Alerts on breaking regulatory changes impacting your business. This exclusive program is tailored to equip employers with the tools they need to strengthen their compliance strategies, mitigate risk, and adapt to the new enforcement priorities taking shape in 2026. Whether you're a federal contractor, a multi-state employer, or simply seeking clarity in a volatile legal environment, FortneyScott’s training series is your go-to resource for substantive updates and actionable guidance . How to Participate : Register now for the FortneyScott Workplace Legal Compliance webinars, podcast notifications and alerts: Register here for all 3 webinars (February 3, March 3 and April 9). Sign Up for notifications of new podcast episodes of DC Insider—Employer Update. Sign Up here to receive Workplace Legal Compliance alerts and updates. If you have an immediate questions or feedback, please contact any of the FortneyScott attorneys or email info@fortneyscott.com .
More Posts