Trump Administration Signals Expanded Federal Scrutiny of Employer DEI
DEI continues to be a high priority issue for the Trump Administration. Recent actions by multiple federal agencies, signal increased scrutiny of employer DEI programs. In the past week alone, the Administration has taken several significant actions:
- The EEOC filed a subpoena enforcement action against Nike based on a May 2024 Commissioner’s charge filed by EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas. The subpoena seeks company-wide information dating back to 2018, reflecting a more expansive approach to DEI-related investigation and increased willingness to pursue enforcement in federal court.
- The Chair of the Federal Trade Commission issued letters to 42 leading law firms warning that participation in the Mansfield Certification program may raise antitrust concerns. EEOC Chair Lucas was copied on the correspondence, highlighting coordinated federal agency attention to diversity-based initiatives.
- President Trump made additional demands on Harvard concerning its DEI-practices, substantially increasing the monetary demands from $200 million to $1 billion, while signaling the possibility of additional legal action, including potential criminal exposure.
- Federal funding was suspended for one of the largest infrastructure projects in the U.S., the $16 Billion Hudson Tunnel project, based on minority set aside contracting requirements, prompting litigation. This action, which impacts train services between New York City and New Jersey, underscores the intersection of DEI initiatives and federal funding risks.
What should employers do now? In the current enforcement environment, employers should:
- Continue to assess DEI programs for legal risk. With a full EEOC quorum now in place, increased scrutiny of corporate DEI programs is likely. Although most employers have reviewed their DEI programs and made necessary changes to address legal compliance, the renewed focus on DEI requires ongoing assessment and update of DEI programs. Ensuring that these best practices remain in place and are followed is crucial.
- Prepare for the possibility of broader EEOC investigations. Recent enforcement activity reflects an increased willingness by the EEOC to pursue company-wide inquiries, often supported by expedited subpoena enforcement in matters that originate as individual discrimination charges filed by white employees and applicants.
- Evaluate participation in diversity rankings and certifications. Employers should evaluate whether participation in voluntary diversity assessments, ranking programs or other public reporting of diversity results unnecessarily raises the organization's profile and invites heightened scrutiny from the EEOC and other enforcement agencies.
Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for additional information on how to be prepared and other best practices recommendations.


















