Supreme Court Rules to Expand Religious Accommodation Obligations
June 29, 2023
Overview
The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Groff v. DeJoy on June 29, 2023 that employers who deny a religious accommodation under Title VII must show that the burden of granting an accommodation would result in substantially increased costs in the conduct of its particular business. While not overturning its 1977 Trans World Airlines v. Hardison decision, the Court rejected its de minimis standard for determining whether a requested religious accommodation was an undue hardship under Title VII.
Background
Gerald Groff, a USPS employee, sued the Post Office after he was fired for missing work on Sunday more than two dozen times between March 2017 and May 2018. He claimed he told USPS that he could not work on Sundays because he wanted to attend church. However, the post office was contractually obligated to deliver Amazon packages on Sunday and could not always find other employees to trade shifts with him. Groff’s supervisor suggested alternatives to missing work entirely including working after church services or taking a full day off during the week to observe the Sabbath. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the post office, finding that the religious accommodation Groff was seeking was more than a “de minimis” burden on the employer and therefore was an “undue hardship” under the Supreme Court’s 1977 Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardison.
Opinion
In the unanimous opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito and to which Justices Sotomayor and Jackson concurred, the Court reversed and remanded the Third Circuit’s decision which relied on the de minimis standard to determine whether a religious accommodation was unduly burdensome. However, the Court did not overturn Trans World Airlines v. Hardison saying the lower courts had taken the Hardison de minimis standard as “the authoritative interpretation of the statutory term “undue hardship” and that “it is doubtful that it was meant to take that large role.” Judge Alito cited Title VII’s statutory language as requiring an employer denying a religious accommodation to show that the burden of granting the accommodation it “would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business.”
The Court rejected Groff’s argument that “undue hardship” should be interpreted as “significant difficulty or expense” as that standard is used in the Americans with Disabilities Act as well as the federal government’s argument that Hardison should be clarified to reflect how lower courts and the EEOC had applied it.
The Court in vacating the decision for USPS stated that they “think it’s appropriate to leave it to the lower courts to apply our clarified context-specific standard and decide whether any further factual development is needed.”
Impact for Employers
This decision increases the burden on employers to prove why granting a religious accommodation would be an “undue hardship.” Although the standard is less than that for the ADA, it is substantially more than the previous
de minimis standard. As the Court was reinterpreting a prior decision, the new standard applies to any pending religious accommodation cases.
The midterms could reshape the legislative and regulatory landscape for employers. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, November 17, 2026, from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EST , for a fast-paced discussion of what’s ahead in Congress and key federal agencies. We’ll cover the Congressional lame duck session and the new 120th Congress, agency priorities, nominations, and expected developments at the DOL, EEOC, NLRB, and DOJ affecting labor, employment, immigration, and DEI issues. Get a clear view of the policy and enforcement trends employers need to watch. Please click here to register for this webinar.
Wage-and-hour compliance continues to be a priority as it evolves in 2026, with new U.S. Department of Labor opinion letters addressing compensable time, travel, meal periods, rounding, bonuses, exemptions and tip practices, alongside significant federal enforcement activity. This one-hour webinar will examine the year’s most important federal developments and translate them into practical compliance lessons for employers. The program will also highlight distinctive District of Columbia wage-and-hour requirements, including current minimum and tipped wage rates, overtime, wage notices, pay statements and recordkeeping obligations, and will conclude with a practical wage-and-hour audit checklist.
Join FortneyScott attorneys on Wednesday, October 28, 2026 from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EDT for a timely and practical webinar on wage and hour. Wage-and-hour compliance continues to be a priority as it evolves in 2026, with new U.S. Department of Labor opinion letters addressing compensable time, travel, meal periods, rounding, bonuses, exemptions and tip practices, alongside significant federal enforcement activity. This one-hour webinar will examine the year’s most important federal developments and translate them into practical compliance lessons for employers. The program will also highlight distinctive District of Columbia wage-and-hour requirements, including current minimum and tipped wage rates, overtime, wage notices, pay statements and recordkeeping obligations, and will conclude with a practical wage-and-hour audit checklist. To register for this webinar, please CLICK HERE .
On August 21, 2026, the OFCCP finally published its final rules upending long-standing affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. While the elimination of EO 11246 regulations was expected, the substantial changes to Section 503 were less expected. By September 21, contractors must not only update their systems to remove now banned requirements but also determine how they will meet their affirmative action requirements without data collection. We will break down the most important developments, explain which obligations remain in place, and highlight practical steps organizations can take now to reduce risk, preserve defensible compliance practices, and prepare for what comes next. In this webinar, you will learn how to: Identify the OFCCP changes most likely to affect your affirmative action program strategy; Evaluate how revised Section 503 requirements may affect disability-related data collection, outreach, and documentation; Understand continuing VEVRAA obligations for protected veteran compliance. Manage transition issues for current and upcoming AAP cycles; and Prioritize practical next steps for policies, records, audits, and stakeholder communications.
Register for FortneyScott's Webinar on New OFCCP Regulations – What Federal Contractors Need to Know
Join FortneyScott attorneys on Thursday, September 10, 2026 from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EDT for a timely and practical webinar on the revised OFCCP regulations and how contractors should respond. To register, click here . On August 21, 2026, the OFCCP finally published its final rules upending long-standing affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. While the elimination of EO 11246 regulations was expected, the substantial changes to Section 503 were less expected. By September 21, contractors must not only update their systems to remove now banned requirements but also determine how they will meet their affirmative action requirements without data collection. We will break down the most important developments, explain which obligations remain in place, and highlight practical steps organizations can take now to reduce risk, preserve defensible compliance practices, and prepare for what comes next. In this webinar, you will learn how to: Identify the OFCCP changes most likely to affect your affirmative action program strategy; Evaluate how revised Section 503 requirements may affect disability-related data collection, outreach, and documentation; Understand continuing VEVRAA obligations for protected veteran compliance. Manage transition issues for current and upcoming AAP cycles; and Prioritize practical next steps for policies, records, audits, and stakeholder communication s. To register for this webinar, please CLICK HERE .
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will publish in the Federal Register the three final rules impacting federal contractor regulations on Friday, August 21, 2026. Executive Order 11246 regulations – DOL finalized the rescission of its regulations for EO 11246, effective October 26, 2026, to eliminate the obligations of federal contractors to prepare affirmative action plans based on race and sex, in addition to nondiscrimination provisions, and additional compliance requirements. This is to align with EO 14373, wherein President Trump rescinded EO 11246. Section 503 of Rehabilitation Act – DOL finalized the elimination of the disability self-identification requirements as well as the 7% utilization goal. In addition, the CC-305 Form will be eliminated. DOL holds that the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits employers, including federal contractors, from collecting voluntary disability identification from applicants and employees. The nondiscrimination and reasonable accommodation requirements are maintained. Contractors with 50 or more employees and $50,000 or more in contracts will continue to be required to prepare affirmative action plans and to assess their outreach and recruitment. DOL moved the administrative procedures provisions from EO 11246 regulations here. VEVRAA – DOL’s revisions to the VEVRAA regulations were mostly technical, retaining the obligation to provide voluntary self-identification of veterans and to prepare affirmative action plans. DOL added the administrative procedures to these regulations and updated the jurisdictional threshold from $150,000 to $200,000. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for more information.
The midterms could reshape the legislative and regulatory landscape for employers. Join FortneyScott attorneys on Tuesday, November 17, 2026, from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EST , for a fast-paced discussion of what’s ahead in Congress and key federal agencies. We’ll cover the Congressional lame duck session and the new 120th Congress, agency priorities, nominations, and expected developments at the DOL, EEOC, NLRB, and DOJ affecting labor, employment, immigration, and DEI issues. Get a clear view of the policy and enforcement trends employers need to watch. Please click here to register for this webinar.
Wage-and-hour compliance continues to be a priority as it evolves in 2026, with new U.S. Department of Labor opinion letters addressing compensable time, travel, meal periods, rounding, bonuses, exemptions and tip practices, alongside significant federal enforcement activity. This one-hour webinar will examine the year’s most important federal developments and translate them into practical compliance lessons for employers. The program will also highlight distinctive District of Columbia wage-and-hour requirements, including current minimum and tipped wage rates, overtime, wage notices, pay statements and recordkeeping obligations, and will conclude with a practical wage-and-hour audit checklist.
Join FortneyScott attorneys on Wednesday, October 28, 2026 from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EDT for a timely and practical webinar on wage and hour. Wage-and-hour compliance continues to be a priority as it evolves in 2026, with new U.S. Department of Labor opinion letters addressing compensable time, travel, meal periods, rounding, bonuses, exemptions and tip practices, alongside significant federal enforcement activity. This one-hour webinar will examine the year’s most important federal developments and translate them into practical compliance lessons for employers. The program will also highlight distinctive District of Columbia wage-and-hour requirements, including current minimum and tipped wage rates, overtime, wage notices, pay statements and recordkeeping obligations, and will conclude with a practical wage-and-hour audit checklist. To register for this webinar, please CLICK HERE .
On August 21, 2026, the OFCCP finally published its final rules upending long-standing affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. While the elimination of EO 11246 regulations was expected, the substantial changes to Section 503 were less expected. By September 21, contractors must not only update their systems to remove now banned requirements but also determine how they will meet their affirmative action requirements without data collection. We will break down the most important developments, explain which obligations remain in place, and highlight practical steps organizations can take now to reduce risk, preserve defensible compliance practices, and prepare for what comes next. In this webinar, you will learn how to: Identify the OFCCP changes most likely to affect your affirmative action program strategy; Evaluate how revised Section 503 requirements may affect disability-related data collection, outreach, and documentation; Understand continuing VEVRAA obligations for protected veteran compliance. Manage transition issues for current and upcoming AAP cycles; and Prioritize practical next steps for policies, records, audits, and stakeholder communications.
Register for FortneyScott's Webinar on New OFCCP Regulations – What Federal Contractors Need to Know
Join FortneyScott attorneys on Thursday, September 10, 2026 from 12:00pm to 1:00pm EDT for a timely and practical webinar on the revised OFCCP regulations and how contractors should respond. To register, click here . On August 21, 2026, the OFCCP finally published its final rules upending long-standing affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. While the elimination of EO 11246 regulations was expected, the substantial changes to Section 503 were less expected. By September 21, contractors must not only update their systems to remove now banned requirements but also determine how they will meet their affirmative action requirements without data collection. We will break down the most important developments, explain which obligations remain in place, and highlight practical steps organizations can take now to reduce risk, preserve defensible compliance practices, and prepare for what comes next. In this webinar, you will learn how to: Identify the OFCCP changes most likely to affect your affirmative action program strategy; Evaluate how revised Section 503 requirements may affect disability-related data collection, outreach, and documentation; Understand continuing VEVRAA obligations for protected veteran compliance. Manage transition issues for current and upcoming AAP cycles; and Prioritize practical next steps for policies, records, audits, and stakeholder communication s. To register for this webinar, please CLICK HERE .
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will publish in the Federal Register the three final rules impacting federal contractor regulations on Friday, August 21, 2026. Executive Order 11246 regulations – DOL finalized the rescission of its regulations for EO 11246, effective October 26, 2026, to eliminate the obligations of federal contractors to prepare affirmative action plans based on race and sex, in addition to nondiscrimination provisions, and additional compliance requirements. This is to align with EO 14373, wherein President Trump rescinded EO 11246. Section 503 of Rehabilitation Act – DOL finalized the elimination of the disability self-identification requirements as well as the 7% utilization goal. In addition, the CC-305 Form will be eliminated. DOL holds that the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits employers, including federal contractors, from collecting voluntary disability identification from applicants and employees. The nondiscrimination and reasonable accommodation requirements are maintained. Contractors with 50 or more employees and $50,000 or more in contracts will continue to be required to prepare affirmative action plans and to assess their outreach and recruitment. DOL moved the administrative procedures provisions from EO 11246 regulations here. VEVRAA – DOL’s revisions to the VEVRAA regulations were mostly technical, retaining the obligation to provide voluntary self-identification of veterans and to prepare affirmative action plans. DOL added the administrative procedures to these regulations and updated the jurisdictional threshold from $150,000 to $200,000. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for more information.
The EEOC voted 2 to 1 on Tuesday, July 21st to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to rescind the requirement for employers and other covered entities to file an annual report with the EEOC summarizing aggregate data on their employees’ race and sex (reports known respectively as the EEO-1, EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4, EEO-5, and EEO-6 reports or EEO Data Reports). This includes the rescission of recordkeeping requirements related to these reports. The proposal states that the Commission has determined the EEO Reports are inconsistent with equal employment opportunity law, may raise constitutional concerns, and that the collection of data is not narrowly tailored or necessary to enforce anti-discrimination statutes. EEOC determined that the reports, which had been collected since, 1966, have limited value, which was outweighed by the significant burdens they impose on employers and on the Commission. Once the NPRM is published in the Federal Register, individuals will have only 30 days to submit comments on the 60-page proposal. The Institute for Workforce Equality is planning to submit comments. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com with any thoughts you have on the proposed rescission, or on employer record-keeping obligations generally.
On Wednesday, June 24, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) extended EEOC’s information collection under the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP) through June 29, 2029. UGESP requires employers covered by Title VII to collect and maintain records on the race, sex and ethnicity of those impacted by their employment selection procedures but does not require employers to report the data. EEOC and other enforcing agencies can then demand to see such data in connection with any investigation of employment discrimination. Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for additional information.
The Directive is driving a significant shift in compensation reporting and transparency across the EU, and requires employers to disclose salary ranges to applicants, share internal pay-setting criteria, and conduct gender pay reporting. With the June 7, 2026, deadline for Member States to transpose the Directive into national law, employers need to understand their compliance obligations and prepare for unresolved implementation questions. In this webinar, FortneyScott attorneys will help U.S. companies with operations in the EU understand the Directive’s requirements, including how they differ from U.S. compliance frameworks. We will discuss best practice lessons that can be adopted from U.S. pay transparency and reporting laws and, importantly, provide key contrasts of the U.S. practices that are not applicable in the EU. Key topics include: The Directive’s scope and coverage Reporting obligations under the Directive Status of Member State transposition Practical compliance steps employers can take now Who should attend. This webinar is designed for in-house counsel, HR leaders, and senior professionals at multi-national organizations responsible for compensation, benefits, and employment law compliance.
Join FortneyScott attorneys on Thursday, June 11, 2026, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. EDT for a complimentary webinar on the European Union (“EU”) Pay Transparency Directive (the “Directive”). To register, please click here . The Directive is driving a significant shift in compensation reporting and transparency across the EU, and requires employers to disclose salary ranges to applicants, share internal pay-setting criteria, and conduct gender pay reporting. With the June 7, 2026, deadline for Member States to transpose the Directive into national law, employers need to understand their compliance obligations and prepare for unresolved implementation questions. In this webinar, FortneyScott attorneys will help U.S. companies with operations in the EU understand the Directive’s requirements, including how they differ from U.S. compliance frameworks. We will discuss best practice lessons that can be adopted from U.S. pay transparency and reporting laws and, importantly, provide key contrasts of the U.S. practices that are not applicable in the EU. Key topics include: · The Directive’s scope and coverage · Reporting obligations under the Directive · Status of Member State transposition · Practical compliance steps employers can take now Who should attend. This webinar is designed for in-house counsel, HR leaders, and senior professionals at multi-national organizations responsible for compensation, benefits, and employment law compliance. Register to attend. To register, please click here .
