OFCCP Issues FAQs for “Campus-Like Settings”
September 11, 2019
The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) provided guidance on how an “establishment” should be determined in a campus-like setting, such as a higher education institution or an office park.
Understanding what constitutes an “establishment” is the cornerstone of federal contractors’ EEO and affirmative action compliance obligations. Federal contractors, generally, are required to develop Affirmative Action Plans (“AAPs”) for each “establishment.” AAPs are proactive tools that monitor most personnel activity ( e.g. , hiring, promotions, compensation and terminations) to determine areas of potential discrimination and areas in which additional diversity efforts need to be focused. OFCCP conducts compliance evaluations and related enforcement activity based on individual “establishments” by reviewing the AAP and related supporting materials. When multiple buildings in a campus-like setting are combined in a single AAP, contractors risk including a larger number of dissimilar employees into a single AAP. This could reduce the effectiveness of the proactive analyses as well as create additional challenges during OFCCP audits.
Key Takeaways : Federal contractors with campus-like settings, including clustered office buildings and higher education campuses, should evaluate whether their AAP structures comport with the factors included in OFCCP’s guidance to minimize the risk of a challenge to the AAP structure and coverage by OFCCP. In particular, higher education federal contractors need to carefully evaluate whether to use a campus-wide approach for developing an AAP, or whether grouping buildings by departments or other related organizational units or functions is appropriate for AAPs. The development of AAPs is a critical component in a federal contractor’s compliance strategy, and federal contractors should secure legal advice on how their AAPs should be structured based on their specific facts and with appropriate consideration of OFCCP’s new guidance.
Additional Information for Higher Education Federal Contractors : OFCCP, in particular, focuses on assessing compliance by higher education federal contractors which began during the Obama Administration. Many reviews of the higher education contractors still are pending. Why? Because OFCCP and the higher education community cannot agree on a fundamental compliance point – the definition of an “establishment.”
“Establishment” is not defined in OFCCP’s regulations. Case law, OFCCP’s compliance manual, trial testimony of a Regional Director, and the agency’s long-standing practice, however, define an “establishment” as a brick and mortar building. Curiously, OFCCP has repeatedly, but not consistently, taken a different position when it comes to higher education contractors. According to OFCCP practice, typically an “establishment” in the context of a college or university is the entire campus.
Last Spring, OFCCP Director Craig Leen promised to issue technical assistance guidance (TAG) for colleges and universities covering a range of issues, including the scope of a higher education AAP. It appears, OFCCP has abandoned – or at least delayed – its promise of a comprehensive TAG in favor of FAQs for Campus-Like Settings generally. These FAQs apply more broadly than just higher education. The FAQs apply to any contractor with multiple buildings in a campus-type setting.
While the sub-regulatory guidance provided in the FAQs is generally phrased in the permissive – “OFCCP may consider” or “Contractors may determine,” the guidance sets forth several factors contractors “should” consider when determining whether multiple buildings “should” be in a single AAP ( FAQ 4 ). Such factors include:
- What is the function of the building, and how do the employees in the building interact with employees in other buildings?
- Are employees across different buildings part of the same organizational unit, such as department, division, section, branch, group, job family, or project team?
- Are the hiring, compensation, and other personnel decisions handled separately at each building or are those functions consolidated across the entire contractor or across multiple buildings on one campus?
- Does each building handle its own recruitment or is that function consolidated across multiple buildings?
- Do the buildings recruit from the same labor market or recruiting area?
- To what extent are other human resources and Equal Employment Opportunity compliance functions operationally distinct for each building or group of buildings?
- To what extent do certain employees perform work functions across various buildings?
OFCCP does not cite to any authority, legal or otherwise, to support these factors or the definition of an “establishment” as a group of buildings located in the same area. These FAQs are sub-regulatory guidance and, as such, it does not bind the contractor community or OFCCP. The structure and scope of an AAP is a critically important compliance decision. Contractors should certainly consider the various options available for structuring their AAPs – grouping multiple buildings in a single AAP per these FAQs; an AAP per building based on OFCCP’s long standing practice; or a Functional AAP per the regulations ( 41 CFR 60-2.1(d)(4) ). Specifically, in our experience involving higher education institutions, there have been limited instances in which OFCCP has accepted AAPs based on sub-campus groupings by departments or functions. OFCCP, however, generally expects that a single, campus-wide AAP will be prepared for colleges and universities, notwithstanding the lack of specific legal authority compelling such an AAP structure.
Please contact your FortneyScott attorney or email us at info@fortneyscott.com for more information about how the new OFCCP guidance applies to your AAP design and related matters.
Special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, joins FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a new Opinion Letter Program , expanding its compliance assistance for workers, employers, and stakeholders seeking clarity on federal labor laws. This initiative enhances guidance on workplace legal requirements by providing official interpretations from five key enforcement agencies. FortneyScott has extensive experience securing opinion letters, and the Firm has successfully obtained significant DOL opinion letters in the past. What Employers Need to Know Through this program, employers can receive official written interpretations of labor laws as they apply to specific workplace situations. The following agencies will issue tailored guidance: Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Provides opinion letters on wage, hour, and employment law matters. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Issues letters of interpretation on workplace safety regulations. Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA): Publishes advisory opinions and information letters on employee benefits compliance. Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS): Releases opinion letters related to veteran employment laws. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA): Offers compliance assistance through the new MSHA Information Hub, featuring regulatory updates and training resources. Why It Matters Opinion letters provide clarity, consistency, and transparency in federal labor law enforcement. Employers can use them as reliable legal guidance to ensure adherence to wage, benefits, and safety requirements, reducing the risk of noncompliance and potential litigation. Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling emphasized that “opinion letters are an important tool in ensuring workers and businesses alike have access to clear, practical guidance.” Next Steps for Employers To leverage this resource, employers can: Explore previously issued guidance . Contact your FortneyScott attorney should you need any assistance in submitting a request for an opinion letter or compliance guidance. This program presents a valuable opportunity for businesses to navigate complex employment laws with authoritative insights from federal agencies. Employers should consider requesting opinion letters when facing regulatory uncertainties to strengthen compliance efforts
On Thursday, June 5, 2025, from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. ET, FortneyScott will host a webinar entitled, EEOC Update in Trump 2.0 . Join us for this practical, timely discussion designed to help HR professionals, in-house counsel, and business leaders navigate these challenging areas. As a special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, will join FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency. To register for this webinar, click here . For additional information, please visit FortneyScott’s website , including recent developments and FortneyScott’s webinars and podcasts .
On May 19, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, which will utilize the False Claims Act (FCA) to investigate and, as appropriate, pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws. Violations of the FCA can result in treble damages and significant penalties. Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum instructing DOJ attorneys to file FCA claims against recipients of federal money if a recipient knowingly violates civil right laws and falsely certifies compliance with Title IV, Title VI, and Title IX of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964. The memorandum states that the FCA is also implicated whenever federal funding recipients and contractors certify compliance with civil rights laws while knowingly engaging in racist preferences, mandates, policies, programs and activities, including through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs that assign benefits or burdens on race, ethnicity, or national origin. The memorandum provided the following example as violating the FCA: Accordingly, a university that accepts federal funds could violate the False Claims Act when it encourages antisemitism, refuses to protect Jewish students, allows men to intrude into women’s bathrooms, or requires women to compete against men in athletic competitions. The Initiative will utilize the FCA to investigate and pursue claims, and will be co-led by the DOJ’s Civil Division’s Fraud Section and the Civil Rights Division. Finally, the DOJ strongly encourages private parties “to protect the public interest by filing lawsuits and litigating claims” under the FCA—reminding the public that successful FCA claims will result in the reporting party receiving a share of the financial damages that are imposed again FCA violators. FortneyScott will continue to monitor these developments. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) officially opened the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection portal today, May 20, 2025. All private employers with 100 or more employees and any federal contractors with 50 or more employees are required to file their EEO-1 Reports by June 24, 2025. On the EEOC website employers can find FAQs , instruction booklet , fact sheets , file specifications and more. In her message announcing the opening of the portal, Acting Chair Andrea Lucas reinforced the Trump Administration’s anti-DEI push, stating: I want to take this opportunity to remind you of your obligations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not to take any employment actions based on, or motivated in whole or in part by, any employee’s race, sex or other protected characteristics. She went on to say that there is no “diversity” exception to Title VII’s requirements and reminded employers that just because employers collect and report race and sex data does not justify using the data to treat employees differently based on protected characteristics. Acting Chair Lucas also noted that President Trump’s Executive Order on disparate impact directed all agencies, including EEOC, to deprioritize “disparate impact” enforcement. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
EEOC is expected to open the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report on May 20, 2025. On May 12, 2025, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the proposed changes to the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report. The EEOC had submitted the revised 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet and justifications for the changes to OMB on April 15. The primary change for employers is the elimination of the report’s non-binary reporting option in response to President Trump’s Executive Order 14168, Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government . In addition, EEOC will no longer provide the “Notice of Failure to File” letter to employers with incomplete or unfiled EEO-1 Reports and updated the procedures for requesting an undue hardship. According to the EEOC’s 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet, employers will have a much shorter filing period to file their reports than in previous years as the portal will close on June 24, 2025 . With this significantly shorter filing period (which is nearly a month shorter than last year), employers should begin collecting their data as soon as possible. One additional note, although Executive Order 11246 was rescinded by President Trump on January 21, 2025, the Booklet notes that federal contractors with 50 or more employees will still be required to file EEO-1 Reports on their 2024 data. FortneyScott will provide an update as soon as EEOC officially announces the opening of the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Reports. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
Special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, joins FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a new Opinion Letter Program , expanding its compliance assistance for workers, employers, and stakeholders seeking clarity on federal labor laws. This initiative enhances guidance on workplace legal requirements by providing official interpretations from five key enforcement agencies. FortneyScott has extensive experience securing opinion letters, and the Firm has successfully obtained significant DOL opinion letters in the past. What Employers Need to Know Through this program, employers can receive official written interpretations of labor laws as they apply to specific workplace situations. The following agencies will issue tailored guidance: Wage and Hour Division (WHD): Provides opinion letters on wage, hour, and employment law matters. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Issues letters of interpretation on workplace safety regulations. Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA): Publishes advisory opinions and information letters on employee benefits compliance. Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS): Releases opinion letters related to veteran employment laws. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA): Offers compliance assistance through the new MSHA Information Hub, featuring regulatory updates and training resources. Why It Matters Opinion letters provide clarity, consistency, and transparency in federal labor law enforcement. Employers can use them as reliable legal guidance to ensure adherence to wage, benefits, and safety requirements, reducing the risk of noncompliance and potential litigation. Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling emphasized that “opinion letters are an important tool in ensuring workers and businesses alike have access to clear, practical guidance.” Next Steps for Employers To leverage this resource, employers can: Explore previously issued guidance . Contact your FortneyScott attorney should you need any assistance in submitting a request for an opinion letter or compliance guidance. This program presents a valuable opportunity for businesses to navigate complex employment laws with authoritative insights from federal agencies. Employers should consider requesting opinion letters when facing regulatory uncertainties to strengthen compliance efforts
On Thursday, June 5, 2025, from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. ET, FortneyScott will host a webinar entitled, EEOC Update in Trump 2.0 . Join us for this practical, timely discussion designed to help HR professionals, in-house counsel, and business leaders navigate these challenging areas. As a special guest, Victoria Lipnic , former EEOC Commissioner and Acting Chair who now is a Partner at Resolution Economics and leader of the firm’s Human Capital Strategy Group, will join FortneyScott attorneys, David Fortney and H. Juanita Beecher, to discuss the latest EEOC developments. Under the leadership of President Trump’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has been busy implementing the Administration’s agenda. This has included President Trump’s Executive Orders announcing forebearance on disparate impact enforcement, focusing on “Illegal DEI,” removing guidance and materials relating to gender identity, and focusing on religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christian bias. We also will discuss the status of the two announced nominations for EEOC commissioners and staffing of critical positions at the agency. To register for this webinar, click here . For additional information, please visit FortneyScott’s website , including recent developments and FortneyScott’s webinars and podcasts .
On May 19, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, which will utilize the False Claims Act (FCA) to investigate and, as appropriate, pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws. Violations of the FCA can result in treble damages and significant penalties. Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum instructing DOJ attorneys to file FCA claims against recipients of federal money if a recipient knowingly violates civil right laws and falsely certifies compliance with Title IV, Title VI, and Title IX of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964. The memorandum states that the FCA is also implicated whenever federal funding recipients and contractors certify compliance with civil rights laws while knowingly engaging in racist preferences, mandates, policies, programs and activities, including through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs that assign benefits or burdens on race, ethnicity, or national origin. The memorandum provided the following example as violating the FCA: Accordingly, a university that accepts federal funds could violate the False Claims Act when it encourages antisemitism, refuses to protect Jewish students, allows men to intrude into women’s bathrooms, or requires women to compete against men in athletic competitions. The Initiative will utilize the FCA to investigate and pursue claims, and will be co-led by the DOJ’s Civil Division’s Fraud Section and the Civil Rights Division. Finally, the DOJ strongly encourages private parties “to protect the public interest by filing lawsuits and litigating claims” under the FCA—reminding the public that successful FCA claims will result in the reporting party receiving a share of the financial damages that are imposed again FCA violators. FortneyScott will continue to monitor these developments. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) officially opened the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection portal today, May 20, 2025. All private employers with 100 or more employees and any federal contractors with 50 or more employees are required to file their EEO-1 Reports by June 24, 2025. On the EEOC website employers can find FAQs , instruction booklet , fact sheets , file specifications and more. In her message announcing the opening of the portal, Acting Chair Andrea Lucas reinforced the Trump Administration’s anti-DEI push, stating: I want to take this opportunity to remind you of your obligations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not to take any employment actions based on, or motivated in whole or in part by, any employee’s race, sex or other protected characteristics. She went on to say that there is no “diversity” exception to Title VII’s requirements and reminded employers that just because employers collect and report race and sex data does not justify using the data to treat employees differently based on protected characteristics. Acting Chair Lucas also noted that President Trump’s Executive Order on disparate impact directed all agencies, including EEOC, to deprioritize “disparate impact” enforcement. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
EEOC is expected to open the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report on May 20, 2025. On May 12, 2025, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the proposed changes to the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Report. The EEOC had submitted the revised 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet and justifications for the changes to OMB on April 15. The primary change for employers is the elimination of the report’s non-binary reporting option in response to President Trump’s Executive Order 14168, Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government . In addition, EEOC will no longer provide the “Notice of Failure to File” letter to employers with incomplete or unfiled EEO-1 Reports and updated the procedures for requesting an undue hardship. According to the EEOC’s 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection Instruction Booklet, employers will have a much shorter filing period to file their reports than in previous years as the portal will close on June 24, 2025 . With this significantly shorter filing period (which is nearly a month shorter than last year), employers should begin collecting their data as soon as possible. One additional note, although Executive Order 11246 was rescinded by President Trump on January 21, 2025, the Booklet notes that federal contractors with 50 or more employees will still be required to file EEO-1 Reports on their 2024 data. FortneyScott will provide an update as soon as EEOC officially announces the opening of the portal for submission of 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Reports. If you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
Most of the remaining employees of the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs received layoff notices this week as the plan to drastically downsize the Office in the wake of Executive Order 14173 proceeds. Affected workers at the OFCCP got a 30-day warning in advance of their June 6th terminations. The agency plans to maintain a presence only in the Southwest region, with a headquarters in Dallas.
President Donald Trump has nominated Brittany Bull Panuccio, an assistant U.S. attorney in Florida, to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. If confirmed, her term would run to July 2029. Panuccio's confirmation would restore the Commission's quorum and create a Republican majority. The reconstituted Commission would be able to issue or withdraw regulations and institute policies in the line with the Trump administrations’ positions. She will join EEOC's Acting Chair, Andrea Lucas, a Trump appointee (renominated), and Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal, who was appointed by President Joe Biden.
Today, the DOL published a Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) to provide enforcement guidance to the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) field staff when determining whether an independent contractor has been misclassified under FLSA. Specifically, the DOL’s Press Release states that the agency is still reviewing the 2024 final rule, Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (2024 Rules) and, therefore, WHD investigators are directed not to apply the 2024 Rule when determining employee versus independent contractor status in FLSA investigation. Instead, investigators are told to rely on the prior version of Fact Sheet 13 that was issued in July 2008 which is included in the FAB, and reinstated Opinion Letter FLSA 2019-6 with respect to any matter for which no payment has been made for back wages and/or civil money penalties as of May 1, 2025. It's important to note that the 2024 Rule remains in effect for purposes of private litigation and nothing in this FAB changes the rights of employees or responsibilities of employers under the FLSA. Employers should review the FAB and the additional documentation to understand how the current Administration will enforce independent contractor misclassification. Should you have any questions, please reach out to your FortneyScott attorney.
As employers navigate evolving legal, political, and cultural dynamics in the workplace, certain core obligations remain as critical as ever. This webinar will focus on three areas of the law that deserve renewed attention in 2025 and beyond: Barrier Analysis: With many employers scaling back or eliminating formal DEI initiatives, barrier analysis has become an essential—and legally sound—tool to identify and prevent workplace discrimination. We’ll explore how employers can use barrier analyses to effectively meet compliance goals and mitigate legal risk. Pay Practices: As state-level requirements continue to expand, pay practices remain central to legal compliance. We’ll break down what employers need to do now to stay ahead of audits, meet transparency mandates, and proactively address pay disparities. Accommodations: Religious and disability-related accommodation requests are on the rise. We’ll discuss recent legal developments and best practices for managing accommodation requests consistently and lawfully.
